Topic 037 · Answers
Adoptive mothers' maternity benefit: age cap struck down
On 17 March 2026 the Supreme Court struck down which Section of the Code on Social Security, 2020 in Hamsaanandini Nanduri v Union of India?
- Section 60(1)
- Correct answer: Section 60(4)
- Section 50(4)
- Section 64(4)
Core Trigger: On 17 March 2026, in Hamsaanandini Nanduri v Union of India, the Supreme Court struck down Section 60(4) of the Code on Social Security, 2020.From Book 1 RATNA, topic 037, point 1
The struck provision gave adoptive mothers maternity benefit only if the child was under what age?
- Six months
- Correct answer: Three months
- One year
- Three years
Struck Provision: The provision gave adoptive mothers maternity benefit only if the adopted child was under three months old.From Book 1 RATNA, topic 037, point 2
The challenge in Hamsaanandini Nanduri was decided by the Supreme Court headed by whom?
- Correct answer: Chief Justice of India
- Attorney-General of India
- Union Labour Minister
- Solicitor General of India
Deciding Court: The Supreme Court of India, headed by the Chief Justice of India, decided the challenge.From Book 1 RATNA, topic 037, point 3
Consider: 1. Adoptive and commissioning mothers now receive twelve weeks of benefit. 2. The benefit runs from the date of the child's birth. Which of the statements is/are correct?
- Correct answer: Only 1
- Only 2
- Both 1 and 2
- Neither 1 nor 2
New Entitlement: Adoptive and commissioning mothers now receive twelve weeks of benefit from the date the child is handed over.From Book 1 RATNA, topic 037, point 4
In which year was the Maternity Benefit Act amended to cover adoptive mothers?
- 2008
- Correct answer: 2017
- 2013
- 2020
Earlier Law: The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 was amended in 2017 to cover adoptive mothers.From Book 1 RATNA, topic 037, point 5
The Code on Social Security, 2020 subsumes which earlier maternity law?
- Employees' State Insurance Act
- Correct answer: Maternity Benefit Act
- Equal Remuneration Act
- Factories Act
Successor Law: The Code on Social Security, 2020 subsumes the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961.From Book 1 RATNA, topic 037, point 6
The Supreme Court that decided Hamsaanandini Nanduri v Union of India sits at which address?
- Correct answer: Tilak Marg, New Delhi
- Sansad Marg, New Delhi
- Janpath, New Delhi
- Raisina Road, New Delhi
Venue: The Supreme Court of India sits at Tilak Marg, New Delhi.From Book 1 RATNA, topic 037, point 8
In which year did the Maternity Benefit Act come into force?
- 1948
- Correct answer: 1961
- 1956
- 1976
Founded: The Maternity Benefit Act came into force in 1961.From Book 1 RATNA, topic 037, point 9
Which 2000 case extended maternity benefit to daily-wage women workers?
- Vishaka v State of Rajasthan
- Correct answer: Municipal Corporation of Delhi v Female Workers (Muster Roll)
- Air India v Nergesh Meerza
- Bandhua Mukti Morcha v Union of India
Landmark: Municipal Corporation of Delhi v Female Workers (Muster Roll) (2000): the Supreme Court extended maternity benefit to daily-wage women workers.From Book 1 RATNA, topic 037, point 10
Consider: 1. Article 14 bars unreasonable classification. 2. Article 42 directs the State to secure maternity relief. Which of the statements is/are correct?
- Only 1
- Only 2
- Correct answer: Both 1 and 2
- Neither 1 nor 2
Articles: Article 14 bars unreasonable classification, Article 21 protects dignity, and Article 42 directs the State to secure just conditions and maternity relief.From Book 1 RATNA, topic 037, point 11
Open these answers in the app (sign-in needed)
SamudraManthan