CLAT-2027 Blog

ICMR-TISS Study: 20 Million Indian Households Can Rise a Class by Quitting Tobacco | CLAT 2027

ICMR-TISS tobacco study in BMJ Global Health — 20 million Indian households could rise a class

CURRENT AFFAIRS | 21 APRIL 2026

CLAT GK | PUBLIC HEALTH | ARTICLE 47 DPSP | COTPA & WHO FCTC

A new economic analysis published in the open-access journal BMJ Global Health — authored by researchers at ICMR-NICPR (Noida) and TISS (Mumbai) — finds that if Indian households quit tobacco, roughly 20.49 million households could rise at least one economic class. Breaking it down: 17 million rural and 3.5 million urban households would see tangible improvements in nutrition, healthcare access and educational spending.

The study estimates that 10.6% of Indian households spend 6.4% of income on tobacco — with the poorest households spending 6.4% while the richest spend only ~2%. Tobacco is, in effect, a regressive tax paid voluntarily by the poor to an industry that profits from their addiction.

Want structured CLAT preparation? Try our free 5-day Bodh Demo Course with live classes and expert guidance. Start Free →

Key Facts at a Glance

Metric Figure
Households spending on tobacco 10.6% (20.49 million)
Household income share on tobacco 6.4%
Tobacco-attributable deaths/year ~1.35 million
Cancer share attributable to tobacco ~27% of all cancers in India
Global smokeless tobacco burden ~70% of global total (India)
Youth (13-15 yrs) tobacco use (GYTS) 8.5%

Constitutional & Statutory Framework

  • Article 47 of the Constitution (DPSP) — directs the State to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living, and “in particular to bring about prohibition of the consumption except for medicinal purposes of intoxicating drinks and of drugs which are injurious to health.” Tobacco control policy derives its constitutional heartbeat from this provision.
  • Article 21 — the right to life and personal liberty, read to include the right to health and a pollution-free environment (Vincent Panikurlangara v Union of India, 1987).
  • COTPA 2003 — the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act. Prohibits advertisement, public smoking, sales to minors, sales near educational institutions, and mandates pictorial health warnings.
  • WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) — first global public health treaty under WHO auspices. India ratified on 5 February 2004, among the first signatories. Implementing obligations flow through Article 253 of the Constitution.
  • PECA 2019 — the Prohibition of Electronic Cigarettes Act — bans production, manufacture, import, export, transport, sale, distribution, storage and advertisement of e-cigarettes and vaping devices.
  • Murli S Deora v Union of India (2001) — the Supreme Court held that smoking in public places violates the Article 21 rights of non-smokers and directed prohibition of public smoking.
  • Cigarettes and Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules, 2008 — mandate pictorial warnings covering 85% of both sides of all tobacco product packaging (upheld in Health for Millions v Union of India, 2017).

Arguments: Policy Levers to Close the Gap

The authors case: Tobacco control must be integrated into flagship poverty, nutrition and livelihood programmes — MGNREGA, PM-KISAN, Poshan Abhiyaan, National Health Mission — rather than remaining siloed within the health ministry. The logic: a rural labourer spending 6.4% of income on beedis is one counselling intervention away from crossing the poverty line.

The fiscal dimension: Higher excise/GST on tobacco products is WHO FCTC Article 6s priority tool — India is currently below the WHO-recommended 75% tax-share-of-retail-price threshold for most tobacco categories, particularly bidis and smokeless products.

The political economy challenge: The tobacco sector supports approximately 45.7 million livelihoods (farming, bidi-rolling, retail). Any reform must pair demand-reduction with crop diversification and alternative livelihoods — a task for the Ministry of Agriculture working with state governments, a State-List subject under Entry 14.

Mnemonic

SMOKE — State duty (Article 47), Murli Deora (2001), One-point-three-five million deaths, Key law COTPA 2003 + PECA 2019, Eighty-five percent pictorial warnings.

CLAT 2027 Angle — What to Memorise

  • Article 47 is the most frequently tested DPSP on health policy MCQs — know the exact language about “intoxicating drinks” and “drugs injurious to health.”
  • COTPA 2003 vs PECA 2019 — COTPA regulates; PECA prohibits outright (e-cigarettes). The distinction is a classic trap.
  • Murli S Deora v UoI (2001) — seminal public-smoking case; often paired with Vincent Panikurlangara (1987) on right-to-health jurisprudence under Article 21.
  • WHO FCTC — first public health treaty under WHO; India ratified 2004; implementing power under Article 253.
  • Pictorial warnings rule: 85% on both sides — upheld in Health for Millions v UoI, 2017.
  • Federalism wrinkle: public health is a State subject (Entry 6, State List), but tobacco control has been centralised via the Union Lists residual and treaty-implementation powers — prime passage-style question territory.

Test Your Understanding — 10 MCQs

Apply what you just read. Explanations appear after each answer.

Practice Quiz — 10 CLAT-Style Questions

Click an option to reveal the answer and explanation.

Quick answers

Which Article of the Constitution directs the State to raise nutrition and prohibit drinks/drugs injurious to health?
Article 47. Article 47 (DPSP) directs the State to raise the level of nutrition and standard of living and to prohibit consumption of intoxicating drinks and drugs injurious to health.
The acronym COTPA 2003 refers to:
Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act. COTPA 2003 is the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade) Act.
India ratified the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in:
2004. India ratified the WHO FCTC on 5 February 2004 — among the first countries to do so.
In Murli S Deora v Union of India (2001), the Supreme Court ordered:
Ban on smoking in public places. Murli S Deora held smoking in public places violates non-smokers Article 21 right to life and directed prohibition of public smoking.
The ICMR-TISS study published in BMJ Global Health found Indian households spending on tobacco is:
6.4% of income. The study found 10.6% of Indian households (20.49 million) spend 6.4% of income on tobacco.
Roughly how many of Indias households could move up an economic class if tobacco use were eliminated?
20 million. The study estimates 20.49 million households — 17 million rural + 3.5 million urban — could move up at least one economic class.
Share this article
CLAT Gurukul
Written by CLAT Gurukul

Ready to Crack CLAT?

This article covers just one topic. Our courses cover the entire CLAT syllabus with 500+ hours of live classes, 10,000+ practice questions, and personal mentorship from top faculty.

500+Hours of Classes
10,000+Practice Questions
50+Mock Tests
Start your CLAT prep with a free 5-day demo course Start Free Trial →