CURRENT AFFAIRS | MAY 15, 2026
A Supreme Court bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and S C Sharma on May 14 pointedly asked the Attorney General why the selection panel for the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners under the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 consists only of the Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition and a Cabinet Minister — a 2:1 ruling-party majority with no neutral member. The AG defended the structure saying “it will always be 2:1, executive controlling everything” and that “once appointed, ECs are independent”. The bench rejected this, holding that the “appointment process itself tests the Commission’s quality”. The case revisits Anoop Baranwal v UOI (2023), which had mandated a CJI-led panel until Parliament legislated. For CLAT 2027, this is a marquee Polity + Constitutional Law passage on independence of constitutional bodies.
Constitutional & Legal Framework
- Article 324 — vests superintendence, direction and control of elections in the Election Commission of India.
- Article 145(3) — substantial questions of constitutional law must be decided by a bench of at least 5 judges.
- CEC and Other ECs Act, 2023 — panel = PM + LoP + Cabinet Minister nominated by PM; replaced CJI.
- Anoop Baranwal v UOI (2023) — mandated CJI-led panel for ECI appointments until Parliament legislated.
- T N Seshan v UOI (1995) — affirmed CEC’s independence and the Commission’s plenary powers.
- Kesavananda Bharati (1973) — free and fair elections held to be part of basic structure.
- Article 324(5) — CEC removable only like a Supreme Court judge (impeachment).
Why It Matters for CLAT 2027
High-probability passage angles:
- Independence of constitutional bodies and the doctrine of institutional integrity.
- Basic structure doctrine applied to electoral democracy — Kesavananda Bharati v Kerala.
- Doctrine of separation of powers and executive over-reach.
- Comparison: CAG, UPSC, ECI appointment mechanisms.
- Parliamentary supremacy vs judicial guidelines — Vishaka v Rajasthan analogy.
- Free and fair elections as a facet of Article 14 and Article 19(1)(a).
Key Facts to Memorise
- Bench: Justices Dipankar Datta + S C Sharma
- Statute challenged: CEC and Other ECs Act, 2023
- Selection panel: PM + LoP + Cabinet Minister (2:1)
- Article: 324 (ECI)
- Key precedent: Anoop Baranwal v UOI (March 2023)
- Earlier landmark: T N Seshan v UOI (1995)
- Basic structure case: Kesavananda Bharati v Kerala (1973)
- CEC term: 6 years or 65 years, whichever earlier
- ECI established: 25 January 1950
Mnemonic / Quick Recall
“PLC picks ECI”
Prime Minister
Leader of Opposition
Cabinet Minister
— the 2023 Act trio (no CJI) that the SC is now scrutinising.
Sources: Indian Express p.1 (May 15, 2026); LiveLaw; The Hindu.
Practice Quiz — 10 CLAT-Style Questions
Click an option to reveal the answer and explanation.
